Matthew’s interpretation of Hosea 11:1 as a messianic prophecy is debated, with critics asserting it represents a misapplication, disregarding the original context where Israel is God’s son. Their arguments highlight the lack of prophetic markers, the disconnection from the rebellious tone of Hosea, and Matthew’s narrative framing. Apologists defend this approach with typology and claims of divine intent but struggle against the original text’s meaning. The analysis raises concerns about interpretive integrity and hermeneutical standards in biblical exegesis.