Critiquing: Should Christians Really Be so Concerned about Homosexuality, Abortion, and Science?

September 7, 2023 | #STRask – Stand to Reason

Key Issues — Cultural Influence — Moral Concerns — AI in Religion — Logical Fallacies

---

Introduction

Main Question: Are homosexuality, abortion, and science truly core concerns for Christians, or are they driven by political agendas?

---

Arguments and Analysis

Framing the Issues

Initial Claim: Politicians may be leveraging these issues to influence Christians.

“Are gays, abortion, and science really the foremost concerns of Christianity, or have politicians figured out how best to herd us?”

Analysis: This suggests a potential misalignment between political and religious priorities.

---

Temporal vs. Eternal Concerns

Claim: These issues will not matter in the final judgment.

“When Jesus returns, it’s over… None of those things are going to matter then, because now Jesus is coming with the word. Judgment.”

Analysis: This draws a distinction between temporary societal issues and eternal spiritual concerns, potentially minimizing the importance of current moral debates.

---

Cultural Pressure on Christians

Claim: Cultural forces compel Christians to address these topics.

“People want to know, is this, is this correct? What the culture is telling me about these things, what they’re pushing in right now…”

Analysis: This highlights the role of societal influence in shaping religious discourse, introducing confirmation bias where Christians seek validation of pre-existing beliefs.

---

Evaluating Homosexuality and Abortion

Homosexuality:

Claim: Cultural acceptance of homosexuality impacts salvation.

“If you have a culture that is championing something that God says is an abomination… their names will not be written in the book of life.”

Analysis: This lacks substantiation and presents a logical leap without clear evidence.

Abortion:

Claim: Abortion is equated with mass murder.

“We have killed more babies in America than… all the Axis armies and all of the allied armies, soldiers, and all of the civilians on both sides that died in World War II, over 60 million.”

Analysis: This comparison is intended to evoke a strong emotional response but falls into the fallacy of false equivalence, equating the moral implications of wartime casualties with abortion without considering the complex ethical and contextual differences.

---

Technological Impacts on Religion

Claim: AI’s role in religious practices is problematic.

“AI can now lead a congregation in prayer and even do a sermon. It doesn’t feel right to me.”

Analysis: The speaker expresses discomfort with AI’s role in religious practices, highlighting concerns about authenticity and personal connection.

“Why would you want a computer guiding you in prayer? I do not understand that.”

Analysis: This highlights a fear of automation and loss of personal touch, reflecting broader societal anxieties about technology. The claim that AI cannot authentically participate in worship because it lacks consciousness and personal experience is a valid concern, though it could benefit from more nuanced arguments and empirical evidence on the impact of AI in religious settings.

---

Critique and Conclusion

Primary Critique: The content relies heavily on emotional appeals and unsubstantiated claims to argue against the prioritization of certain social issues in Christianity. The discussion often employs cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and the appeal to tradition, to bolster its points.

Example:

“These are the areas where Christians are being pressured to conform to non-biblical views. So of course, these are the questions that we’re getting from people.”

Substantiate Claims: Provide evidence and logical pathways linking cultural practices to theological consequences.

Avoid Logical Fallacies: Refrain from false equivalence and ensure comparisons are contextually and ethically relevant.

Balance Emotional Appeals: While emotion can be persuasive, it should not replace logical argumentation and evidence-based reasoning.

---

Testing Alleged Promises

The content could benefit from discussing methods to empirically test alleged divine promises. For example, if certain behaviors are said to lead to specific outcomes, establishing clear criteria and measurable indicators could allow for an evidence-based evaluation.

Belief and Evidence Mapping

Finally, the content should emphasize the principle that belief should be proportionate to evidence. Encouraging a critical examination of evidence supporting or refuting religious claims would lead to a more reasoned and coherent discourse.

---

Thank you for engaging with this critique. Please feel free to discuss these arguments further in the comments section.