Critiquing: #004 — Qs on Mission, Evangelism, Islam and other religions

December 31, 2018 | Ask NT Wright Anything – Premier

Evangelism Strategies — Post-Christian World — Repentance Message — Jesus and Islam — Religious Dialogue

---

Episode Assessment:

Metric	———	Commentary
Degree of Accuracy	B+	Generally accurate with well-substantiated claims, but some interpretations are debated among scholars.
Degree of Coherence	A-	The arguments are logically structured, connecting historical context with theological insights.
Absence of Fallacies	B	Minor logical inconsistencies, but overall arguments are sound.
Degree of Evidence	B+	Substantial references to historical texts and scholarly works, though some claims rely heavily on interpretation.
Degree of Testability	C+	Many claims are theological and interpretive, making empirical testing difficult.
Rational Confidence	B	Arguments are well-supported within their theological framework, though confidence is moderated by the interpretive nature of the content.

---

Potential/Apparent Weaknesses:

1. Degree of Testability

The claims presented in the podcast are primarily theological and interpretive, making empirical testing challenging. NT Wright discusses evangelism strategies and the intersection of Christianity with Islam, but these are inherently difficult to verify through empirical means. For instance, the assertion that “Jesus is the only way to God” relies on theological interpretations rather than empirical data.

“I think knowing for sure is something that our culture is so keen on doing. How can I know for sure that Jesus is the only way to God?”

2. Rational Confidence

While the podcast provides well-supported arguments within a theological framework, the confidence in these arguments is moderated by their interpretive nature. Wright’s discussion on presenting the gospel to Muslims and the concept of repentance reflects deep theological beliefs, yet these interpretations are not universally accepted, affecting the overall confidence in the claims made.

“When I see the great story of Scripture, I see the story of Creator and Cosmos converging onto the story of Israel.”

Muslims cite the alleged Creator and Cosmos they see in the Qur’an as evidence for the truth of Islam.

---

Formulations of Major Arguments

Argument #1: Evangelism in a Post-Christian World

• Premise 1: The early church evangelized through radically different living, which drew attention and interest.
• Premise 2: Modern evangelism should similarly focus on living out a radically different, counter-cultural lifestyle.
• Premise 3: Effective evangelism integrates both verbal proclamation and living testimony.
• Conclusion: Therefore, evangelism in a post-Christian world requires a holistic approach that combines lifestyle and message.

Counter-Argument: While living a counter-cultural lifestyle may attract attention, it does not necessarily convey the specific theological message of Christianity. People might admire the lifestyle without understanding or accepting the underlying faith. Additionally, in a pluralistic society, numerous groups advocate different “radical lifestyles,” making it challenging for any single one to stand out as uniquely compelling.

---

Argument #2: Repentance and Modern Evangelism

• Premise 1: The biblical message of repentance involves a change of mind, direction, and lifestyle.
• Premise 2: Modern presentations of the gospel often omit the call to repentance.
• Premise 3: Authentic evangelism must include the call to repentance as central to the gospel message.
• Conclusion: Therefore, modern evangelism must reclaim the emphasis on repentance to align with biblical teachings.

Counter-Argument: The concept of repentance, as traditionally understood, may alienate contemporary audiences who view it as judgmental or outdated. Emphasizing repentance can reinforce negative stereotypes about Christianity being moralistic and condemnatory. Furthermore, cultural shifts towards individualism and relativism challenge the acceptance of absolute moral standards, making the call to repentance a difficult message to convey effectively.

---

Argument #3: The Exclusivity of Jesus as the Way to God

• Premise 1: Jesus’ claim to be “the way, the truth, and the life” implies exclusivity.
• Premise 2: The New Testament consistently presents Jesus as the unique path to God.
• Premise 3: Christianity maintains that salvation is found only through Jesus.
• Conclusion: Therefore, Jesus is the only way to God, according to Christian doctrine.

Counter-Argument: The exclusivity claim is contentious in a pluralistic world where multiple religions coexist, each with its own path to the divine. This claim can be perceived as intolerant and dismissive of other faith traditions. Additionally, interfaith dialogue and global interconnectedness promote a more inclusive view of spirituality, challenging the idea that any one religion holds the sole truth.

---

Argument #4: Engaging with Islam and Other Religions

• Premise 1: Muslims revere Jesus as a prophet but do not accept him as the Son of God.
• Premise 2: Effective dialogue with Muslims involves discussing commonalities and respectful exploration of differences.
• Premise 3: Presenting Jesus as more than a prophet requires sensitivity and understanding of Islamic beliefs.
• Conclusion: Therefore, engaging with Muslims about Jesus necessitates a nuanced and respectful approach.

Counter-Argument: While dialogue is essential, deeply entrenched theological differences between Christianity and Islam make consensus challenging. The fundamental divergence on Jesus’ identity is a significant barrier, and efforts to present Jesus as more than a prophet may be seen as disrespectful or proselytizing. Moreover, historical and cultural tensions between the two faiths complicate attempts at mutual understanding and acceptance.

◉ Addressing Argument #1:

The Apparent Absence of the Holy Spirit in Apologetics

Introduction

1 Peter 3:15 commands Christians to “always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect.” Despite this clear directive, many Christians active in apologetic encounters fail to exhibit these qualities, instead adopting a more aggressive and confrontational approach. This discrepancy raises significant questions about the role and efficacy of the Holy Spirit in guiding believers’ behavior, providing yet another reason to question the validity of Christianity.

The Holy Spirit’s Role in Christian Conduct

The New Testament consistently teaches that the Holy Spirit indwells believers, guiding them toward Christ-like behavior, including gentleness and respect. Galatians 5:22-23 describes the fruit of the Spirit as love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. If the Holy Spirit is truly active within believers, one would expect these qualities to be evident, especially in contexts like apologetics, where the faith is defended and explained.

Incongruity in Apologetic Practices

However, the behavior of many Christians in apologetic encounters often starkly contrasts with these virtues. Instead of gentleness and respect, there is frequently a display of aggression, hostility, and a win-at-all-costs mentality. This incongruity suggests either a failure of the Holy Spirit to influence believers’ behavior or an absence of the Spirit altogether. Such behavior raises questions about the transformative power of the Holy Spirit that Christianity claims to possess.

The Influence of Cultural Factors

One might argue that cultural factors play a role, with modern society rewarding aggressive and combative debate styles. While this is a valid point, it does not fully explain the failure to align with the biblical command for gentleness and respect. If the Holy Spirit is indeed active and powerful, it should enable believers to resist cultural pressures and maintain Christ-like behavior. The pervasive failure to do so suggests a disconnect between the professed influence of the Holy Spirit and observable behavior.

Failures in Discipleship and Spiritual Formation

Another potential explanation is inadequate discipleship and spiritual formation within the church. While this is undoubtedly a factor, it again points to a deeper issue: if the Holy Spirit were genuinely present and active, it would presumably compensate for human shortcomings in teaching and mentorship. The persistent gap between the ideal of Spirit-led behavior and the reality of aggressive apologetics suggests a lack of the Spirit’s evident influence.

Psychological and Emotional Factors

Personal insecurities and defensiveness can contribute to aggressive apologetic styles. However, the Holy Spirit is purported to bring peace and confidence to believers, helping them respond with grace rather than hostility. The prevalence of defensive and aggressive behavior indicates a significant shortfall in this promised transformation, further calling into question the active presence of the Holy Spirit.

Theological Misunderstandings

Some might suggest that misunderstandings of scripture lead to inappropriate apologetic tactics. While this is plausible, it also underscores a broader issue: the Holy Spirit is said to guide believers into all truth (John 16:13). Persistent misinterpretations and the resulting aggressive behavior suggest a failure in this guidance, raising doubts about the Spirit’s active role in believers’ lives.

Conclusion

The failure of many Christians in apologetics to emulate the commands of 1 Peter 3:15 provides compelling evidence against the transformative power of the Holy Spirit. Despite biblical promises of the Spirit’s influence leading to gentleness, respect, and other Christ-like behaviors, the reality often starkly contrasts with these ideals. This discrepancy between belief and behavior offers a strong reason to question the validity of Christianity and the presence of the Holy Spirit, highlighting a significant inconsistency in the faith’s core claims.