Critiquing: #042 — Ananias and Sapphira and more tricky theological questions
August 28, 2020 | Ask NT Wright Anything – Premier
Ananias and Sapphira — Theological questions — New Testament — Church discipline — Divine judgment
Episode Assessment:
 | | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Degree of Accuracy | B | Generally accurate in terms of theological content and historical context. The episode faithfully discusses key New Testament narratives and theological principles without major errors. However, some nuanced interpretations may require further scholarly validation, particularly those pertaining to the nature of divine intervention. |
| Degree of Coherence | B | Logical structure is maintained throughout the discussion, with clear articulation of complex theological issues. The episode follows a coherent progression, addressing questions in a systematic manner. However, there are moments where the discussion tangentially deviates from the core topic, affecting overall coherence. |
| Absence of Fallacies | C+ | Minor logical inconsistencies, particularly in addressing the nature of divine judgment and human free will. Some arguments rely on assumptions that are not fully substantiated within the conversation, leading to potential logical gaps. For instance, equating church discipline directly with divine judgment needs more robust theological underpinning. |
| Degree of Evidence | B- | Adequate use of scriptural references and theological sources, though some claims would benefit from additional citation. The episode references multiple biblical passages and theological concepts, supporting the discussion. However, some assertions could be reinforced with more specific theological or historical evidence to enhance credibility. |
| Degree of Testability | C | Theological assertions are inherently challenging to test empirically, but the reasoning aligns well with established doctrinal interpretations. The nature of theological discourse often limits empirical testability, yet the episode provides reasoned arguments that are consistent with mainstream Christian thought. Nonetheless, certain theological claims, such as divine judgment practices, remain speculative. |
| Rational Confidence | B | Confidence is generally supported by theological tradition and scriptural interpretation, though the application to modern contexts could be further substantiated. The episode displays a high level of rational confidence in its conclusions, grounded in established theological frameworks. However, applying these conclusions to contemporary issues may require additional empirical or experiential support. |
Potential/Apparent Weaknesses:
1. Addressing Divine Judgment
The explanation of Ananias and Sapphira’s sudden deaths may benefit from further theological exploration. The claim that “Peter was allowing that power to go out of him” suggests a human influence on divine judgment which is not fully substantiated.
“Peter was allowing that power to go out of him in a way that without God necessarily ordaining that these people were killed.”
This assertion could be perceived as diminishing the sovereignty of God in such events. A more thorough examination of early church contexts and theological interpretations of divine judgment would provide a more balanced perspective. Additionally, exploring alternative viewpoints, such as viewing the event as a narrative device to convey the seriousness of integrity within the early church, might offer deeper insight.
2. Understanding Church Discipline
The connection between divine judgment and church discipline could be more robustly articulated. The narrative implies a seamless transition from Old Testament notions of divine retribution to New Testament community discipline without fully addressing the theological shift introduced by Christ’s atonement.
“There is such a thing as church discipline, and it’s to be taken very seriously. And it’s as though this is a bit of a church discipline which God is doing himself.”
This point could be strengthened by a deeper discussion on how church discipline is understood in light of the New Covenant. Integrating perspectives on how the early church navigated the balance between grace and accountability, and examining historical practices of church discipline, would enhance the argument’s depth and coherence.
3. Human Free Will and Divine Foreknowledge
The discussion on open theism and divine foreknowledge may leave some questions unanswered regarding the compatibility of free will with God’s omniscience. The concept of God’s “gentle, wise steering of things” suggests a middle ground that requires more thorough theological backing.
“The way God’s freedom is exercised seems to be through a gentle, wise steering of things but with all sorts of human engagement and interaction.”
This approach could benefit from further clarification on how it aligns with scriptural evidence of God’s sovereignty. Examining more detailed theological perspectives on how divine foreknowledge and human freedom coexist, and providing examples from both historical and contemporary theological debates, would solidify this argument and address potential ambiguities.
Formulations of Major Arguments
Argument 1: The Holiness of the Church Community
- The early Christian community is the new temple of God.
- God’s presence in the community demands high moral and spiritual standards.
- Ananias and Sapphira’s deception violated these standards.
- Therefore, their deaths serve as a divine warning to maintain the community’s holiness.
Counter-Argument:
While the holiness of the church community is paramount, interpreting the deaths of Ananias and Sapphira as a divine warning must be contextualized within the broader narrative of God’s grace. The New Testament emphasizes God’s love and forgiveness through Christ, suggesting that severe punitive actions may not align with the overall message of the Gospel. Additionally, the sudden death of Ananias and Sapphira can be seen as an anomaly rather than a normative method of divine judgment. This interpretation could be strengthened by considering the early church’s struggle to establish authority and integrity, which might explain the inclusion of such a dramatic account to underscore the seriousness of communal honesty.
Argument 2: Divine Judgment Post-Cross
- The cross represents a pivotal shift in how God’s judgment is executed.
- The deaths of Ananias and Sapphira occurred after the cross.
- Thus, divine judgment in the New Testament era can still include immediate punitive actions.
Counter-Argument:
The cross indeed marks a significant transformation in the execution of divine judgment, emphasizing redemption and grace over immediate retribution. The story of Ananias and Sapphira should be interpreted with caution, recognizing it as an exceptional case within the transitional period of early Christianity. Moreover, the broader New Testament narrative advocates for repentance and restoration, suggesting that punitive actions should lead to spiritual growth rather than fear of divine wrath. Analyzing other New Testament instances where mercy and forgiveness are highlighted, such as the stories of the prodigal son or the adulterous woman, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of post-cross divine judgment.
Argument 3: The Problem of Evil and Suffering
- The problem of evil is a persistent challenge in Christian theology.
- Human suffering often raises questions about God’s justice and love.
- Instances like the deaths of Ananias and Sapphira complicate the understanding of divine benevolence.
- Therefore, theological explanations must balance divine justice with the New Testament’s portrayal of a loving God.
Counter-Argument:
While the problem of evil remains complex, the New Testament consistently portrays God as compassionate and merciful. The suffering of Ananias and Sapphira, though difficult to reconcile, should not overshadow the broader scriptural emphasis on God’s redemptive plan. Theological explanations must consider the entirety of the biblical narrative, which underscores God’s desire for reconciliation and healing, rather than isolated incidents of judgment. Additionally, exploring theological constructs such as theodicy, which seek to explain why a benevolent and omnipotent God allows suffering, can provide a more nuanced understanding of how divine justice and love coexist. This approach encourages a holistic view that incorporates both the justice and mercy of God in addressing the problem of evil.
◉ Addressing Argument #2: Atrocities in the Church and the Lack of Consistent Divine Judgment
The Inconsistency of Divine Judgment in the Modern Church
There are atrocities in the Church today every bit as abominable as the sins of Ananias and Sapphira. This assertion underscores a critical examination of the apparent inconsistency in divine judgment across different eras of the Church. The biblical account of Ananias and Sapphira’s sudden death for their deceitful actions is often cited as a stark demonstration of God’s immediate judgment. However, the absence of similar divine interventions in contemporary times raises questions about the authenticity and consistency of such accounts.
The Lack of God’s Consistent Judgment Across Time
One of the primary arguments against the historical account of Ananias and Sapphira is the noticeable absence of equivalent divine judgments in the present-day Church. Modern Church scandals involving financial fraud, sexual misconduct, and abuse have not been met with the same immediate and severe divine retribution described in Acts 5. This discrepancy suggests a potential inconsistency in how divine justice is administered, leading to skepticism about the historical validity of such miraculous judgments.
The Role of Scientific Verification in Miracle Claims
This skepticism is further compounded by the observation that miracle claims have significantly decreased as scientific understanding and verification methods have advanced. In earlier times, miracles were frequently reported and often accepted without rigorous scrutiny. However, as science has developed more robust methodologies for investigating and verifying extraordinary claims, the frequency of reported miracles has declined.
The disappearance of miracles coinciding with the advent of scientific inquiry suggests that many historical miracle accounts may not withstand rational scrutiny. This correlation raises doubts about the authenticity of miraculous events reported in the past, including the account of Ananias and Sapphira.
Consistency with Other Miraculous Categories
This pattern is consistent with other categories of miracles, such as healings, exorcisms, and divine apparitions, which have also seen a decline in credible reports in the modern era. The alignment between the reduction in miracle claims and the increase in scientific capability to investigate these claims supports the argument that many reported miracles may have natural explanations or be products of myth and legend rather than genuine divine interventions.
Conclusion
The apparent inconsistency in divine judgment across time, coupled with the decline in miracle claims as science advances, casts doubt on the authenticity of accounts like that of Ananias and Sapphira. If such divine judgments were genuine and consistent, one would expect similar occurrences in the modern Church, given the persistence of comparable transgressions. The historical pattern of miracles suddenly disappearing when they can be more readily verified demonstrates that many of these accounts, including the story of Ananias and Sapphira, are legitimately suspect.
We warmly welcome your thoughts and insights on this topic. Please feel free to discuss and share your perspectives in the comments section below.
Free of Faith 
Leave a comment