Stand-to-Reason – Free of Faith

Click on a category above to view all associated posts.

All Stand to Reason Critiques:

STR 24/07/29: Eternal Defiance

The STR podcast discusses whether humanity’s justice is better than God’s, addressing questions about divine punishment versus human rehabilitation, and the rationale behind God’s requirement to punish sin rather than simply forgive. The critique argues that the podcast’s claims about continuous rebellion in Hell are illogical, highlighting the inconsistency of this notion with the biblical…
STR 24/07/25: Canceling Humanity

The STR podcast discusses why God did not restart humanity by destroying Adam and Eve immediately after their sin, the possibility of another fall in the new creation, and the nature of free will in the afterlife. The critique argues that the podcast’s content is logically inconsistent and relies on unsubstantiated claims, highlighting the problematic…
STR 24/07/22: Boasting in Weakness

The STR podcast discusses the concept of “boasting in our weaknesses” from a biblical perspective, exploring how believers can find strength in their vulnerabilities through faith in God. It also addresses how Christians can sanctify Christ as Lord in their hearts and integrate their faith into all aspects of their lives, including hobbies and secular…
STR 24/07/18: Scrutinizing God

The STR podcast discusses the justification for God’s actions, such as the killing of the firstborn in the tenth plague and the flood, arguing that divine authority allows for actions that may seem unjust to humans. It also touches on the issue of God creating calamities today and the moral implications of such actions. The…
STR 24/07/15: Will All Worship God?

The STR podcast discusses whether the Bible says that everyone will eventually worship God, explores the purpose of worship, and addresses questions on God’s actions and judgments, including the killing of the firstborn in Egypt and the occurrence of calamities. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, highlighting issues such as…
STR 24/07/11: Post-Mortem Salvation

The STR podcast addresses the question of whether post-mortem salvation is an orthodox doctrine, concluding that it is not supported by scriptural evidence and emphasizing the immediacy of judgment after death. It discusses the importance of making a decision for salvation within one’s lifetime. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast,…
STR 24/07/08: A Holy Spirit for All?

The STR podcast discusses whether all believers receive the Holy Spirit according to the book of Acts and explores the nature of belief and the transition from the Old to New Covenant. It argues that genuine believers receive the Holy Spirit as a theological standard despite the transitional events depicted in Acts. The critique highlights…
STR 24/07/04: AI & Truth

The STR podcast explores the limitations of relying on AI to find truth, the role of personal testimony in apologetics, and the challenges of effectively sharing the gospel. It emphasizes the importance of personal interaction and the potential biases in AI-generated responses. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, noting that…
STR 24/07/01: Divine Signals

The STR podcast explores whether one should maintain a decision made after prayer if the outcome is unfavorable and how to discern if God is calling someone to a specific action. It emphasizes making decisions based on wisdom and counsel while trusting in God’s sovereign will despite the results. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and…
STR 24/06/27: The Nature of Heaven

The STR podcast addresses questions about Jesus’ ability to interact with individuals in eternity given his physical body and how a Jewish rabbi might defend the position that Jesus is not the Messiah. It explores theological perspectives on the nature of heaven, divine interaction, and the messianic expectations. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims,…
STR 24/06/24: Payment for Sin

The STR podcast addresses theological questions about whether Jesus’ death was a genuine sacrifice given his foreknowledge of resurrection, the practices of his disciples regarding temple sacrifices, and the concept of sin causing separation from God. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, noting the reliance on ambiguous language and fallacious…
STR 24/06/20: Polygamous Marriage

The STR podcast explores why the Israelites were not explicitly forbidden to practice polygamy, discussing the biblical model of marriage and how key figures like Solomon, who had multiple wives, still imparted wisdom on relationships. It also addresses the reasons behind the lack of prohibition and the implications of these historical practices. The critique highlights…
STR 24/06/17: Double Predestination (2)

The STR podcast discusses how to respond to Reformed Christians who believe in double predestination and dismiss non-believers as lost causes, addressing the necessity of preaching the gospel regardless of perceived elect status and the complexities of faith plus works in salvation. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and cognitive dissonance in the podcast, emphasizing the…
STR 24/06/13: Double Predestination (1)

The STR podcast discusses how to respond to Reformed Christians who dismiss non-believers as lost causes and addresses the balance between faith and works for salvation, encouraging proactive engagement and challenging the “let go and let God” mentality. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and cognitive biases in the podcast, pointing out unsubstantiated claims and the…
STR 24/06/10: Religious Manipulation

The STR podcast addresses claims that the Bible and church are man-made tools to control people, arguing that such views are based on genetic fallacies and misrepresent the inclusive and valuable nature of church teachings. It emphasizes that rejecting church teachings due to perceived control overlooks the truth and moral guidance they offer. The critique…
STR 24/06/06: Same-Sex Weddings

The STR podcast addresses the ethical dilemma of whether it is morally acceptable for a conservative Christian to cover a coworker’s shift so they can officiate a same-sex wedding, suggesting that it depends on personal conscience and the perceived immorality of the action. It compares this scenario to less controversial situations, such as covering a…
STR 24/06/03: The Listening Dead

The STR podcast discusses whether deceased Christians can hear the prayers of the living, concluding that they cannot due to the nature of omniscience and concerns about necromancy. It argues that only God has complete knowledge and that asking deceased Christians to intercede is both theologically and practically problematic. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive…
STR 24/05/30: Agnosticism Strategies

The STR podcast discusses strategies for engaging with agnostics, focusing on questioning their assumptions, presenting arguments for God’s existence, and addressing the limitations of scientism. It suggests that agnostics often rely too heavily on scientific evidence, ignoring other forms of knowledge and evidence for God. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive biases, and unsubstantiated claims…
STR 24/05/27: A Personal Relationship

The STR podcast discusses how to explain a personal relationship with God practically, emphasizing ongoing communication, trust, and prayer practices, while addressing questions about praying to different members of the Trinity. It describes this relationship as interactive and emotionally engaging, likening it to a familial hierarchy. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive biases, and unsubstantiated…
STR 24/05/23: OT Reliability

The STR podcast discusses the reliability of the Old Testament, highlighting the textual consistency between the Masoretic Text and the Dead Sea Scrolls, as well as archaeological findings that support biblical accounts. It argues that while some historical standards differ, the overall integrity of the Old Testament is maintained. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive…
STR 24/05/20: Evolution’s Purpose

The STR podcast discusses whether evolution has a purpose, arguing that Darwinian naturalism inherently lacks teleology and that the concept of “survival of the fittest” is tautological. The podcast also addresses the nature of mutations, emphasizing their randomness and lack of goal orientation. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive biases, and unsubstantiated claims within the…
STR 24/05/16: Condemning Crusaders

The STR podcast discusses whether the Crusades are proof that Christians are evil, arguing that while some atrocities occurred, they do not reflect the teachings of Christianity and were instead the actions of misled individuals. The podcast also emphasizes the positive contributions of Christianity, such as the spread of literacy and humanitarian efforts. The critique…
STR 24/05/13: Social Justice

The STR podcast discusses whether Matthew 23:23 supports the concept of social justice, concluding that it does not and arguing that social justice is a misinterpretation influenced by critical theory. It emphasizes that biblical justice is about giving people their proper due, not about modern notions of equity and redistribution. The critique of the podcast…
STR 24/05/09: Elijah Reincarnated

The STR podcast addresses whether the Bible teaches that Elijah was reincarnated as John the Baptist, arguing that reincarnation is incompatible with Christian theology and that John the Baptist is better understood as an “Elijah type” figure rather than a literal reincarnation. The critique of the podcast highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive biases, and unsubstantiated claims…
STR 24/05/06: Clarity of Scripture

The STR podcast discusses the doctrine of biblical perspicuity, arguing that the essential teachings of the Bible are clear despite potential ambiguities arising from translation and cultural differences. It suggests that effective communication of critical matters was the intention of biblical writers, and readers must employ good hermeneutics to understand the texts clearly. The critique…
STR 24/05/02: Babies & Semantics

The STR podcast discusses whether an embryo can be considered a baby and the ethical implications of IVF and genetic testing to avoid carrying a baby with an inherited genetic disorder. It argues that developmental stages should not diminish the intrinsic value of the human being at any stage. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive…
STR 24/04/29: At God’s Right Hand

The STR podcast addresses questions about the relationship between Jesus and God, specifically how Jesus can sit at the right hand of God if He is God, and why the Synoptic Gospels do not explicitly portray Jesus as divine. The podcast discusses the concept of the Trinity and the high Christology found in different gospel…
STR 24/04/25: A Second Baptism

The STR podcast discusses how to respond to someone who is part of the Word-Faith movement and believes in a second baptism of the Holy Spirit, emphasizing the importance of understanding the foundational doctrines of the Holy Spirit. It critiques the Word-Faith perspective by highlighting what it views as theological inconsistencies and a misinterpretation of…
STR 24/04/22: Same-Sex Weddings

The STR podcast discusses how a father should talk to his children about attending their mother’s same-sex wedding, addressing the complexities of family dynamics, moral beliefs, and the importance of respect and honor in relationships. It also touches on responding to species confusion and managing anger in moral debates. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and…
STR 24/04/18: Loss for Words

The STR podcast discusses strategies for responding gracefully when feeling stuck or unsafe in conversations and offers guidance on witnessing to and discipling a transsexual individual interested in Christianity. It emphasizes gathering information, understanding the nature of sin, and providing compassionate support. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast,…
STR 24/04/15: Does Evil Exist?

The STR podcast discusses the necessity of proving the existence of evil before using it as an argument for the existence of God, highlighting common perceptions of evil and addressing challenges to this viewpoint. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast, arguing that the assumption of universal knowledge of…
STR 24/04/11: Unequally Yoked

The STR podcast discusses whether it is appropriate to participate in a music ministry led by a professing Mormon, the implications of dating someone less spiritually mature, and interpreting Matthew 5:38-42 in the context of manipulation. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, focusing on the arguments against Mormon leadership in…
STR 24/04/08: Is God Always Good?

The STR podcast discusses maintaining a balanced belief in God’s goodness while rejecting prosperity teaching, addressing the nature of God’s jealousy, and the implications of God changing his mind. The hosts, Amy Hall and Greg Koukl provide their perspectives on these theological questions and emphasize the importance of understanding God’s definition of goodness. The critique…
STR 24/04/04: Effects of Apologetics

The STR podcast discusses whether apologetics has had a positive effect on culture, with hosts Amy Hall and Greg Koukl arguing that despite cultural decline, apologetics has positively impacted many individuals and communities. They also address the privatization of faith and recommend works by C.S. Lewis and Francis Schaeffer for those interested in apologetics. The…
STR 24/04/01: Nutshell Christianity

The STR podcast discusses how to articulate the beauty of the Christian worldview, addressing themes of morality, cultural impact, political foundations, and the separation of church and state. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast’s arguments, emphasizing the need for empirical evidence and a balanced consideration of secular perspectives.
STR 24/02/28: Garden or Harvest?

The STR podcast discusses the roles of “gardeners” and “harvesters” in evangelism, offering strategies for engaging apathetic individuals and addressing the falsifiability of Christian claims. It emphasizes that most people are gardeners, contributing incrementally to spiritual journeys, while harvesters finalize conversions. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies in the podcast, such as unsubstantiated claims and reliance…
STR 24/02/26: Epistemic Honesty

The STR podcast discusses strategies for ensuring open-minded consideration of other people’s arguments and addresses why some non-believers feel there isn’t enough evidence for God’s existence. Hosts Amy Hall and Greg Koukl emphasize the importance of awareness of confirmation bias and offer advice on fostering critical thinking. The critique highlights several logical inconsistencies and cognitive…
STR 24/02/22: Debating Atheists

The STR podcast discusses strategies for debating atheists, focusing on the cosmological, design, and moral arguments to support theistic beliefs. Hosts Amy Hall and Greg Koukl emphasize asking questions to understand the atheist’s stance and present their arguments in a conversational manner. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast’s…
STR 24/02/19: The Existence of Evil

The STR podcast explores whether one can directly argue from the existence of evil to the existence of the Christian God, and discusses the moral implications of Abraham’s command to sacrifice Isaac, contrasting Christian theology with other monotheistic religions. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies in the podcast, such as unsubstantiated claims and circular reasoning, and…
STR 24/02/15: Eve & The Tree

The STR podcast addresses hypothetical theological questions, such as whether sin would have entered the world if only Eve had eaten the forbidden fruit, and discusses the theological reasoning behind why Jesus did not inherit a sinful nature from Mary. It explores the implications of Adam’s role as the head of humanity and touches on…
STR 24/02/12: Obligations to God

The STR podcast discusses how believers can evaluate if they are doing enough for the Lord, addressing questions about obligations, evangelism, and the use of LDS resources for family research. The critique highlights the need for clearer guidance, specific criteria, and evidence-based claims within the podcast, pointing out logical inconsistencies and biases that could be…
STR 24/02/08: Our Inner Voice

The STR podcast discusses how to discern between one’s inner voice and the Holy Spirit’s guidance, emphasizing that the Holy Spirit provides the necessary words in critical moments but not through direct dictation. The hosts argue that scriptural references do not support the idea of God whispering specific messages to individuals. The critique highlights logical…
STR 24/02/05: Personalized Bible

The STR podcast discusses how to interpret and apply Biblical teachings to modern life while avoiding the imposition of personal circumstances on the text, and addresses whether the Great Commission applies to all believers or only the apostles. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and cognitive biases in the podcast’s arguments, emphasizing the need for substantiating…
STR 24/02/01: Story of Reality?

The STR podcast discusses whether Christianity is a story of reality or primarily about following Jesus, examining theological questions regarding John the Baptist and the broader narrative of the Bible. It emphasizes the idea that Christianity encompasses a complete worldview, not just a set of rules. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive…
STR 24/01/29: Shifts in Morality

The STR podcast discusses the challenges of applying modern moral standards to historical events and the implications this has for the moral argument for God’s existence. It also addresses theological questions, such as following a God who allowed his son to be killed, providing a defense of these views within a Christian framework. The critique…
STR 24/01/25: Grounding Morality

The STR podcast addresses an atheist challenge regarding the grounding of objective morality in God, with Greg Koukl defending the idea that morality is based on God’s unchanging and morally perfect nature, while responding to accusations of genocide, slavery, and torture being justified by divine command. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims within…
STR 24/01/22: Annihilationism

The STR podcast addresses concerns about a spouse’s belief in annihilationism, discussing its implications on family and evangelism while comparing it to universalism and traditional views of hell. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast’s arguments, emphasizing the need for rigorous evidence-based evaluation of doctrinal positions.
STR 24/01/18: Universal Salvation

The STR podcast discusses whether specific Bible verses support the idea of universal salvation, with Greg Koukl and Amy Hall arguing against the interpretation that everyone will be saved. They critique Dr. David Bentley Hart’s views, emphasizing traditional interpretations of Hell and judgment. The critique (of their critique) highlights logical inconsistencies, fallacies, cognitive biases, and…
STR 24/01/15: Consent Concerns

The STR podcast addresses whether consent to sex equates to consent to pregnancy, arguing that the natural consequences of sex include the possibility of pregnancy and therefore entail a responsibility for potential outcomes. The hosts also contend that abortion is unjustifiable if the fetus is considered a human being with inherent rights. The critique highlights…
STR 24/01/11: Demonic Discourse

The STR podcast discusses whether labeling ancestor communication as demonic is appropriate, the incompatibility of Christian and non-Christian marriages, and the nature of God’s presence. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases within the podcast, emphasizing the importance of substantiating beliefs with evidence and accurately representing alternative perspectives.
STR 24/01/08: Jury Duty Pronouns

The STR podcast discusses whether one should provide their preferred pronouns when asked by a judge during jury duty, arguing against compliance on the grounds of resisting social engineering and maintaining personal convictions. It also addresses how to respond to Christians who advocate for using preferred pronouns as an act of kindness and love. The…
STR 24/01/04: Making Things Up

The STR podcast discusses the concept of Christian liberty in Romans 14, differentiating between weaker and stronger Christians, and emphasizing the importance of not judging others while respecting individual consciences. It asserts that liberty allows for non-sinful choices without promoting moral relativism or antinomianism. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast,…
STR 24/01/01: Divorce Regulation

The STR podcast discusses whether Moses was wrong for giving laws that regulated practices God hates, such as divorce, considering the hardness of human hearts and the necessity of practical governance. It explores the tension between ideal moral laws and the need for civil laws to accommodate human imperfection. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and…
STR 23/12/28: Following Feelings

The STR podcast discusses whether feelings should have epistemological weight in decision-making, especially within a religious context, and examines how to interpret several biblical passages related to being led by the Spirit. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and cognitive biases in the podcast, emphasizing the need for more rigorous substantiation of claims and the importance…
STR 23/12/21: Paying the Price

The STR podcast discusses how to respond to a formerly Muslim friend who is hesitant to convert to Christianity due to the personal sacrifices involved and addresses the implications of Acts 17:23 regarding judgment. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims within the podcast, emphasizing the need for evidence-based reasoning and critical examination of…
STR 23/12/18: Bungling Empiricism

The STR podcast discusses how to engage with a strict empiricist, questioning the consistency of their belief system, and addresses why God would create beings with senses that cannot detect Him. It also examines whether the presenter’s method of introducing objective truth is adequate. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast,…
STR 23/12/14: His Hubby

The STR podcast discusses whether it is appropriate to refer to a legally married same-sex partner as a husband or wife and addresses concerns about a socially transitioned individual serving in a church’s youth ministry. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, arguing that the refusal to acknowledge legal same-sex marriages…
STR 23/12/11: Resurrection Silence

The STR podcast discusses why the resurrection of multiple people mentioned in the Gospel of Matthew is not corroborated by other biblical or extra-biblical sources, addressing related questions about the mechanics of rainbows and Jesus’ instructions to those he healed. The hosts argue for the reliability of biblical accounts and offer explanations based on historical…
STR 23/12/07: Defending Christianity

The STR podcast discusses the hardest aspect of Christianity to defend, focusing on the theological issue of human moral responsibility despite inherent sinfulness, and explores the difficulties of reconciling this belief with intuitive moral reasoning and cultural pressures. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast, stressing the need for…
STR 23/12/04: Worshiping Trees

The STR podcast addresses questions about whether Jeremiah 10:1–5 condemns Christmas trees, the extra-biblical nature of celebrating Christmas and Easter, and the differing divine responses to Zechariah and Mary. It argues that Jeremiah’s passage criticizes idolatry, not Christmas trees, and clarifies the biblical basis for Christian celebrations. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies in the podcast,…
STR 23/11/30: Failed Promises?

The STR podcast discusses how persecuted Christians might have understood Psalms promising protection and rescue, addresses potential contradictions in the New Testament, and examines the historical integrity of the Bible. It explores whether promises of divine protection should be interpreted metaphorically or eschatologically and highlights the importance of textual criticism in assessing scriptural reliability. The…
STR 23/11/27: Unanswered Prayers

The STR podcast discusses a mother’s concern about her teenage daughter who walked away from faith due to unanswered prayers and a lack of emotional transformation after accepting Christ, with hosts providing perspectives on emotional expectations and the nature of prayer. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies in the podcast’s explanations, emphasizing the need for empirical…
STR 23/11/23: Continuing in Sin

The STR podcast discusses whether Christians who continue to sin are hypocrites, differentiating between sins of action and sinful character flaws, and addresses related questions about the salvation of Ananias and Sapphira and the prioritization of evangelism over other church activities. The critique highlights the podcast’s logical inconsistencies, such as unsubstantiated claims and cognitive biases,…
STR 23/11/20: 2nd Coming Speculation

The STR podcast discusses whether Jesus has already come, comparing it to Elijah’s return as John the Baptist, and addresses Jesus’ apocalyptic prophecies and the significance of his resurrection in salvation. The critique of the podcast identifies logical inconsistencies, fallacies, and cognitive biases, emphasizing the need for substantiated claims and evidence-based beliefs in discussing theological…
STR 23/11/16: God in a Box

The STR podcast discusses whether confining God’s revelation to the 66 books of Scripture limits Him and addresses concerns about missing verses and the Bible’s trustworthiness. The critique highlights logical fallacies, cognitive biases, and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast’s arguments, emphasizing the need for robust evidence and critical engagement with counterarguments to support theological assertions.
STR 23/11/13: Surrogacy Concerns

The STR podcast discusses the ethical and philosophical objections to surrogacy, highlighting concerns about emotional bonds, commodification of human life, and the moral implications of the practice. The critique points out logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, emphasizing the need for evidence-based arguments and identifying logical fallacies and cognitive biases that undermine the…
STR 23/11/09: Enjoyment in Prayer

The STR podcast discusses whether individuals are responsible for enjoying prayer, worship, and Bible reading or if this enjoyment is ignited by divine intervention, and also addresses the appropriateness of sharing grief and pain within a religious context. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, pointing out the ambiguity in assigning…
STR 23/11/06: Engaging JWs

The STR podcast provides advice on starting conversations with Jehovah’s Witnesses, focusing on asking respectful questions and discussing key doctrinal points such as the authority of religious organizations and the person and work of Christ. It also addresses engaging with New Age beliefs and the challenges of interpreting religious texts. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies…
STR 23/11/02: Justice & Wrath

The STR podcast discusses the biblical definition of God’s wrath, distinguishing it from human anger and exploring the emotional and moral challenges Christians face when considering the fate of non-believers. It emphasizes that divine wrath is an expression of justice and not comparable to human rage. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in…
STR 23/10/30: Gays in Christ

The STR podcast addresses whether two legally married men with an adopted daughter should divorce if they choose to follow Christ and explores how Christians can show compassion on issues like homosexuality and abortion. The critique highlights the podcast’s logical inconsistencies, such as the dismissal of legal marriage definitions and gender identities, and points out…
STR 23/10/26: Higher Powers

The STR podcast addresses questions about the importance of believing in a specific higher power, the impact of attending different types of churches, the practice of wishing dead loved ones “happy heavenly birthdays,” and when to leave a parachurch organization due to theological disagreements. It also critiques the concept of listening prayer as non-biblical. The…
STR 23/10/23: Responsibility for Sin

The STR podcast explores whether God should be held morally accountable for creating a world where people sin, discussing analogies and arguments to justify God’s moral innocence. It addresses the role of moral freedom and theodicy in understanding the coexistence of good and evil. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and flawed analogies in…
STR 23/10/19: God’s Goodness

The STR podcast discusses questions about God’s goodness, providing responses to teens questioning God, ways to handle coworkers’ jokes about church, engaging with apathetic individuals, and evangelism tips for high school students with non-Christian friends. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast’s arguments, stressing the importance of evidence-based belief…
STR 23/10/16: Euthanasia Debate

The STR podcast discusses the ethical differences between euthanizing pets and humans, strategies for explaining biblical marriage to children, and the concept of biological sex. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast, emphasizing the need for evidence-based arguments and the proportionality of beliefs to available evidence.
STR 23/10/12: No Atheist Argument?

The STR podcast argues that there is no such thing as an atheist argument, discusses the difficulties of proving a negative, and critiques the notion of morality being determined by societal consensus. The critique highlights logical fallacies, unsubstantiated claims, and misrepresentations within the podcast, emphasizing the importance of rigorous evidence and sound reasoning in forming…
STR 23/10/09: Cosmological Speculation

The STR podcast addresses questions about the non-eternality of the universe, presenting scientific and philosophical arguments to support the claim that the universe had a beginning and discussing the theological implications of evolution. The critique of the podcast highlights logical inconsistencies, cognitive biases, and unsubstantiated claims in the arguments, emphasizing the need for aligning beliefs…
STR 23/10/05: Indoctrinated Kids

The STR podcast addresses various questions about Christianity, discussing topics like indoctrination at a young age, interpreting life events as part of divine plans, marking texts, and the concept of the Bible as a living text. The critique of the podcast highlights logical inconsistencies, such as the problematic use of the term “indoctrination,” the ambiguity…
STR 23/10/02: Defining “Faith”

The STR podcast discusses navigating conversations about faith, utilizing apologetics effectively, and addressing the statement “Certainty is a sin.” It emphasizes the importance of clarifying definitions and avoiding mischaracterizations to engage in meaningful dialogue about religious beliefs. The critique of the podcast points out logical inconsistencies, such as straw man and equivocation fallacies, and highlights…
STR 23/09/28: Hearing God’s Voice

The STR podcast explores whether John 10 supports the belief that Jesus speaks to people today, discussing the interpretation of “hearing Jesus’ voice” and addressing related scriptural passages. It also responds to anecdotal claims of divine communication, emphasizing a figurative rather than literal understanding of hearing God’s voice. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies and fallacies…
STR 23/09/25: Confrontation Guidance

The STR podcast addresses whether Matthew 19:27–29 encourages believers to leave their spouses for ministry work and discusses the proper way to handle a friend living in sin. The podcast emphasizes the importance of church discipline and correct scriptural interpretation in guiding moral decisions. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast,…
STR 23/09/21: Questioning Atheism

The STR podcast discusses Greg Koukl and Amy Hall’s strategies for using questions to address challenges to Christianity, highlighting tactics from Koukl’s new book *Street Smarts*. It emphasizes gathering information and subtly guiding conversations towards Christian conclusions. The critique identifies logical fallacies in the podcast, such as assuming conclusions within premises and using false analogies,…
STR 23/09/18: Literal vs. Contextual

The STR podcast discusses whether atheists interpret the Bible more literally than Christians and explores how to argue for God’s attributes through cosmological evidence. It emphasizes the importance of context in biblical interpretation and critiques atheists’ approach to literal readings. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, arguing that it contains…
STR 23/09/14: Counter-Columbo

The STR podcast discusses how to handle situations when someone uses the Columbo tactic against you, the importance of defending only certain core doctrines, and balancing time spent on apologetics with other spiritual activities. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, such as oversimplification and the straw man fallacy, and emphasizes the need for evidence-based reasoning in…
STR 23/09/11: Little Green Demons

The STR podcast discusses the potential nature of aliens, proposing they might be evil spirits or have occultic connections, and examines how the existence of aliens could impact Christian faith. It addresses questions about the spiritual implications of alleged biological evidence from UFO crashes and the broader theological significance of extraterrestrial life. The critique identifies…
STR 23/09/07: Cultural Pressures

The STR podcast questions whether Christians should prioritize concerns about homosexuality, abortion, and science, suggesting these issues may be politically rather than theologically driven, and discusses cultural pressures and the role of AI in religious practices. The critique highlights that the podcast relies heavily on emotional appeals and unsubstantiated claims, often employing cognitive biases and…
STR 23/09/04: Canon Disputes

The STR podcast discusses the validity of the Protestant canon of Scripture, the authorship of the New Testament books, and how to engage with differing views on Paul’s apostleship. It emphasizes the historical and theological reasons for adhering to the 66-book canon. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies and cognitive biases in the podcast, noting its…
STR 23/08/31: Relevance of Apologetics

The STR podcast discusses strategies for teaching apologetics to those who find it uninteresting or irrelevant, emphasizing the importance of grounding faith in objective evidence while acknowledging personal religious experiences. It suggests practical approaches like role-playing exercises to engage learners and addresses the validity of religious experiences. The critique highlights the logical inconsistencies and cognitive…
STR 23/08/28: Judgment Paradox

The STR podcast discusses the permissibility of judging others, specifically addressing the claim that it is acceptable to judge someone who is being judgmental. It also explores responses to the assertion that humans are merely animals. The critique highlights the logical inconsistencies and cognitive biases present in the podcast, noting that the arguments often lack…
STR 23/08/24: Mormon Doctrine

The STR podcast discusses potential objections a Mormon might have to the Gospel of John, focusing on differences in beliefs about Jesus’ divinity, pre-existence, and the Trinity. It emphasizes the importance of clarity and understanding these differences when engaging in Bible study with Mormons. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in…
STR 23/08/21: Christianity’s Spread

The STR podcast addresses questions about the spread of Christianity, the moral implications of leaving others behind in Hell, and the validity of older religions compared to Christianity. It explores the rapid spread of Christianity, the idea of true Christian love in the context of eternal punishment, and challenges to ancient religious beliefs. The critique…
STR 23/08/10: Bible Ban Blues

The STR podcast discusses whether the Bible should be removed from public schools under a law prohibiting indecent material, with hosts arguing against the removal by differentiating between indecent material and educational content. They also address concerns about discussing nudity in art with children and the appropriateness of praying in private spaces. The critique highlights…
STR 23/08/07: Bacon Bad

The STR podcast discusses why God commanded Israel not to eat pigs and addresses the theological implications of Jesus’ statement about his yoke being easy despite the apparent difficulty of fighting sin. It explores speculative cultural and health reasons for the dietary laws and the shift from Old to New Covenant practices. The critique highlights…
STR 23/08/03: Euthyphro Dilemma

The STR podcast discusses how grounding morality in God’s nature purportedly resolves the Euthyphro dilemma, arguing that God’s character provides a non-arbitrary standard of goodness. It also addresses the issue of whether moral values are merely a result of societal consensus over time. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast, noting…
STR /23/07/31: Near-Death Experiences

The STR podcast discusses questions about Christianity, including how to proceed with someone uncertain about their faith, whether near-death experiences prove there’s no afterlife, and cultural practices regarding long hair. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the podcast, emphasizing the need for empirical evidence and coherent argumentation.
STR 23/07/27: Human Flaws

The STR podcast addresses the questions of whether humans are flawed due to God’s lack of power and why worship is beneficial, with Greg Koukl and Amy Hall discussing various perspectives on these topics. They explore the implications of a powerful creator God and the nature of goodness and evil. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies…
STR 23/07/24: Pride Happy Hour

The STR podcast discusses the appropriateness of attending a Pride-themed happy hour at work, comparing it to Jesus dining with sinners versus attending a same-sex wedding, and explores responses to slogans like “Love is love” and the redefinition of family. The critique identifies logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims within the podcast, highlighting fallacies such as…
STR 23/07/20: Columbo Questions

The STR podcast discusses strategies for engaging with individuals who identify as spiritual but not religious, using the “Columbo” questioning technique to clarify their beliefs and challenge inconsistencies. It also addresses how to respond to health and wealth preaching and the departure from traditional church teachings. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies in the podcast’s assumptions…
STR 23/07/17: Love & Condemnation

The STR podcast discusses the questions of why humans should love as God loves but not condemn as He condemns, whether Jesus would have commanded actions similar to those in the Old Testament, and the implications of spreading or withholding the gospel. It also addresses the reasoning behind God’s actions in biblical events like the…
STR 23/07/13: Proving Faith Wrong

The STR podcast discusses the possibility of science disproving all faith-based religions and the effectiveness of role-playing objections in youth groups. The critique highlights logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims in the podcast content, stressing the need for evidence-based reasoning and a clearer distinction between empirical and metaphysical claims.
STR 23/07/10: Pro-Life Tactics

The podcast critiques common pro-choice arguments and defends the pro-life stance by addressing three main points. First, it deconstructs the slogan “not getting between a woman and her doctor,” comparing it to a bank robbery to highlight its perceived absurdity. This analogy is criticized for false equivalence and straw man fallacies. Second, it discusses God’s…

STR 23/07/06: Christian Anxieties

The article addresses whether fear of death implies a lack of genuine Christian faith, contrasting emotional responses with intellectual assessments. It argues that fear of death is a common experience and not necessarily indicative of weak faith, though it fails to substantiate this claim adequately. The discussion differentiates between trusting the heart, which is seen…
STR 23/07/03: Textual Inerrancy

This article examines the claim that the Bible is inerrant only in its original manuscripts, exploring its logical coherence and pointing out inconsistencies. It highlights that this claim, while standard, remains untestable since the original manuscripts are unavailable, making assertions of their perfection unsubstantiated. The article also notes the numerous manuscript variations, emphasizing the confirmation…
STR 23/06/29: Moral Imperatives

The podcast examines whether Christians are bound by any rules other than loving God and others, following Jesus’ fulfillment of the law. Amy Hall and Greg Koukl address this question, rejecting antinomianism—the belief that Christians are not bound by moral laws. They argue that while Jesus’ fulfillment of the law means Christians are not under…
STR 23/06/26: Hearing God’s Voice

The article “How Should I Respond to Those Who Claim God Told Them to Do Something?, discusses approaches to tactfully respond to claims of divine communication. It suggests letting such claims slide unless they influence leadership decisions. Three key questions are recommended to address these claims: understanding the claim, finding scriptural backing, and questioning the…
STR 23/06/22: Prayer Validity

The article critiques the logical coherence of a discussion on whether it’s appropriate to pray with Christians who believe their words can create things. It highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, cognitive biases, and logical fallacies within the content. Key issues include confusion between prayer and sympathetic magic, vague examples, and a lack of supporting evidence…
STR 23/06/19: Sacrifice After Sin

The podcast titled “Why Does God Require Sacrifice after Sin?” explores theological justifications for sacrifices following sin, focusing on Genesis 3:21 and substitutionary atonement. It argues that sacrifices symbolize the need to cover sin, as exemplified by God making garments for Adam and Eve. The critique identifies several logical inconsistencies and cognitive biases in the…
STR 23/06/15: Abortion’s Impact

The podcast from Stand to Reason discusses pro-choice objections to anti-abortion arguments, focusing on whether abortion is a culture-war issue and the rights of unborn babies. Amy Hall and Greg Cocle present counterarguments, aiming to defend their pro-life stance. They commit the straw man fallacy by oversimplifying their opponents views. The assertion that “the unborn…
STR 23/06/12: Worthy of Worship

The STR podcast from June 12, 2023, titled “Anyone Worthy of Worship Wouldn’t Want It”, explores questions about worship and the appropriateness of seeking rewards for good deeds. The critique identifies several logical inconsistencies and fallacies within the arguments. The analogy comparing worship to applauding excellence in sports is criticized for being a false analogy,…
STR 23/06/08: Apologist Journey

The podcast, “How Do I Begin My Journey to Become an Apologist?”, offers guidance for those interested in becoming apologists. Greg Koukl and Amy Hall share personal experiences and provide advice on following interests, seeking education, and engaging in practical apologetics. They suggest formal education through institutions like Biola University and emphasize the importance of…
STR 23/06/05: Will and Omniscience

This article critiques the logical coherence of an argument discussing Jesus’ omniscience, divine and human natures, and their implications. It identifies several logical inconsistencies, such as the paradox of Jesus limiting his omniscience while being fully omniscient. The article highlights the speculative nature of these theological claims and points out the failure to provide clear,…
STR 23/06/01: God’s omnipresence

The podcast, titled “How Would You Explain God’s Omnipresence to a Six-Year-Old?”, from June 1, 2023, by #STRask – Stand to Reason, addresses several theological and philosophical questions. The discussions include explaining God’s omnipresence to a child, reconciling God’s identification as male despite biological definitions, the thief’s statement to Jesus as a trigger for entry…
STR 23/05/29: Pharaoh’s Rebellion

The STR podcast, Why Would God Harden Pharaoh’s Heart against the Israelites?, explores the reasoning behind a divine decision to harden Pharaoh’s heart, the nature of human rebellion, and the interplay of free will and divine intervention. It presents several arguments, such as the idea that God strengthens Pharaoh’s rebellion to achieve a greater purpose,…
STR 23/05/25: Gospel without Hell?

In the podcast, the discussion revolves around whether the gospel would still be considered good news if hell did not exist. The initial interpretations are inconsistent, reflecting a lack of clear stance. The argument explores beliefs like annihilationism and universalism, often presenting a false dilemma by simplifying complex theological perspectives. The focus shifts to reconciliation…
STR 23/05/22: Conviction Test

The content from the #STRask podcast by Stand to Reason discusses methods for questioning the authenticity of someone’s faith and deciding when to stop engaging with individuals who deny key elements of faith. The hosts suggest asking clarifying questions about what it means to be a Christian and observing the person’s life for signs of…
STR 23/05/18: History or Mytho-History

The article evaluates the logical coherence of a discussion on whether Genesis 1–11 should be considered historical or mytho-history. The hosts, Amy Hall and Greg Kockel, explore various viewpoints, notably those of William Lane Craig. Several logical inconsistencies are identified, such as the ambiguous use of the term mytho-history and potential equivocation fallacy regarding the…
STR 23/05/15: Prophetic Methods

The article discusses the clarity of God’s communication, particularly referencing Numbers 12:6-9, and critiques mystical methods used to hear from God. It argues that when God desires to communicate, He does so clearly, regardless of whether the method is direct speech, visions, or dreams. However, the article acknowledges that interpreting dreams and visions can involve…
STR 23/05/11: Overcoming Tribulation

The STR podcast examines the theological assertion that Jesus has overcome the world despite the ongoing presence of suffering and sin. It emphasizes that Jesus’ overcoming provides a foundation for peace and perseverance rather than an immediate end to tribulations. The explanation that hardships are investments for future rewards in the afterlife is a central…
STR 23/05/08: Government Overreach

The podcast explores the question of how Romans 13:3 can be true when some governments persecute Christians. Greg Cokol and Amy Hall argue that while God ordains governments to punish evil and promote good, human corruption can lead governments astray. They reference the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates, suggesting that lesser authorities can resist higher…
STR 23/05/04: Understanding Oneness

The podcast “How Can I Explain the Trinity to a Muslim?” addresses the challenge of explaining the Trinity to a Muslim audience, highlighting several logical inconsistencies and fallacies. It uses semantic differentiation to avoid apparent contradictions in describing the Trinity, which leads to confusion rather than clarity. The article commits an equivocation fallacy by ambiguously…
STR 23/05/01: Testing Faith

This article explores the narrative of Jesus healing a blind man in Bethsaida in two stages, as described in Mark 8:22–26. It presents two main interpretations: the blind man’s weak faith required a gradual healing process, or the event symbolizes the spiritual blindness of the people and disciples. The article asserts the account’s authenticity by…
STR 23/04/27: Apologetics Website

The STR podcast titled “Why Do You Need to Work so Hard to Defend Christianity if It’s True?” addresses questions from non-believers about the necessity of defending Christianity. The responses include comparisons between the effort in apologetics and scientific inquiry, emphasizing that finding truth often requires hard work. However, this analogy is flawed as it…
STR 23/04/24: Corporate Prayer

The podcast from Stand to Reason explores three main issues: handling corporate prayer amid scriptural misuse, understanding Jesus’ references to the cross, and debating extra-biblical speculations. Greg Koukl and Amy Hall address listener questions, emphasizing the virtue of recognizing scriptural misuse while promoting tolerance. They argue that Jesus’ followers could not fully grasp his references…
STR 23/04/20: Is Miscarriage a Crime?

The STR podcast critiqued several arguments presented in a transcript discussing abortion, library censorship, and the relationship between creationism and scientific coherence. Key logical inconsistencies identified include a false analogy comparing abortion and miscarriage to murder and accidental death, and a straw man fallacy that oversimplifies the opposing viewpoint. The argument for removing explicit pro-transgender…
STR 23/04/17: God’s Reach

This article explores whether God could reach a second-century Shinto monk seeking redemption and if someone could have faith in Jesus but not attain eternal life due to not being chosen. Led by Amy Hall and Greg Cokol on the Stand to Reason podcast, the discussion posits that God can reach the monk if he…
STR 23/04/13: God of which Covenant?

This article critiques a discussion on whether homosexuals are harder to reach with the gospel, focusing on logical coherence and inconsistencies in the presented arguments. The content claims that the same God operates under different covenants in the Old and New Testaments but fails to provide sufficient evidence for this drastic change in divine interaction.…
STR 23/04/10: Testing the Spirits

This article critiques the logical coherence of arguments presented in a discussion about the nature of spirit beings and the biblical basis of inner healing prayer. It identifies several logical inconsistencies, such as a false dichotomy in the initial question and the use of anecdotal evidence, which introduces confirmation bias. The article highlights the reliance…
STR 23/04/06: Authorial Intent

The podcast, Why Should We Try to Understand the Author’s Intent When Interpreting the Bible?, from Stand to Reason argues for interpreting texts based on the author’s original intent, criticizing postmodern approaches that allow for subjective interpretations. Greg Koukl emphasizes that ignoring authorial intent leads to distorted meanings and uses analogies like math textbooks and…
STR 23/04/03: Struggle with Sin

The podcast “Am I at Risk of Losing My Salvation?” from Stand to Reason addresses a question about whether continuous sin and daily repentance threaten one’s salvation. The hosts, Amy Hall and Greg Cokel, argue that salvation is secure through grace, despite ongoing sin, emphasizing that Christians should not worry about losing salvation due to…
STR 23/03/30: Group Prayer Efficacy

The STR podcast questions if more people praying increases the likelihood of answered prayers, exploring various theological perspectives and personal anecdotes. The primary claim lacks empirical support and contains logical inconsistencies, as it suggests both that the number of prayers can and cannot influence outcomes without clear rationale. The idea that Christians can feel someone’s…
STR 23/03/27: Apathy Challenge

The article critiques a discussion from Stand to Reason addressing the challenge of individuals who believe Christianity is true but are apathetic about converting. The primary approach discussed involves using fear of judgment and punishment to motivate conversion, suggesting that fear of divine judgment will compel individuals to act. However, the article identifies logical inconsistencies…
STR 23/03/23: DEI Controversy

The STR podcast argues that adding adjectives to the term “justice” corrupts its meaning, politicizing and distorting its essence. The examples of “social justice” and “reproductive justice” are used to illustrate this corruption, suggesting these terms import political ideologies, specifically Marxist notions, and pervert the original concept of justice. The article draws parallels with historical…
STR 23/03/20: Abraham’s Test

The article critiques the discussion on the biblical story of Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son Isaac, as presented in “A God Who Told Me to Kill My Son Would Not Be the God for Me.” The speakers argue that Abraham’s actions were justified by his faith in God’s ultimate goodness and plan, suggesting that…
STR 23/03/16: A Begotten Jesus

This article critically examines the interpretation of Hebrews 1:5 and the concept of testing God. It questions the claim that the New World Translation is a corrupt version without providing specific evidence. Logical inconsistencies are identified, such as the confusion around the term “begotten” and selective textual interpretation, which undermines the argument’s credibility. The distinction…
STR 23/03/13: Standards of Evidence

The article “When Atheists Say, ‘That’s Not Evidence'” by #STRask addresses common atheist criticisms about evidence and free will in a religious context. It critiques atheists for allegedly dismissing evidence due to an unwillingness to consider opposing views, which is presented as a straw man fallacy. The article also conflates freedom with the absence of…
STR 23/03/09: Mentorship Challenges

The STR podcast titled “What Should I Say to Someone Who Claims to Be a Christian but Doesn’t Live Like It?” addresses how to approach individuals identifying as Christians whose lifestyles do not reflect traditional Christian values. It discusses the increased cultural hostility towards Christianity, emphasizing the need to communicate truthfully and graciously. The speakers…
STR 23/03/06: Views on Baptism

This article critiques the best way to talk to Mormon missionaries about their view of baptism. It emphasizes the fundamental differences between traditional Christian and Mormon beliefs, particularly regarding baptismal authority. The speakers, Amy Hall and Greg Koukl, argue that Mormons believe only they have the priesthood authority to baptize, contrasting this with Christian teachings…
STR 23/03/02: Capital Punishment

The article “What Should Christians Think about the Death Penalty?” from #STRask – Stand to Reason explores the moral and scriptural basis for capital punishment from a Christian perspective. It argues that God endorses capital punishment, citing Genesis 9:6, and maintains that the inequities in its application should be rectified rather than the practice being…
STR 23/02/27: Divorce and Deconversion

This critique evaluates the logical coherence of whether deconversion is grounds for divorce, identifying logical gaps and unsubstantiated claims. It questions the impact of a believer’s presence on non-believers and critiques the content’s use of confirmation bias, appeal to authority, circular reasoning, and unsubstantiated claims. It proposes empirical methods for testing alleged promises and emphasizes…
STR 23/02/23: Salvation and Works

This content critiques certain New Testament passages emphasizing works over faith for salvation. It analyzes logical consistency, proposes reinterpretations, and identifies fallacies. The critique questions the causal relationship between faith and works, challenges the necessity of external righteousness, and advocates for empirical evidence and critical thinking in interpreting religious texts.
STR 23/02/20: Gender Identity

The analysis critiques the logical coherence of arguments related to gender identity, highlighting misapplications of relativism, false dichotomies, straw man arguments, logical fallacies, cognitive biases, unsubstantiated claims, and a lack of evidence-based reasoning. It advocates for a more rigorous critique based on empirical data and alignment with available evidence for logical coherence.
STR 23/02/16: Judgment and Hypocrisy

“Are Christians Not Supposed to Judge?” explores the nature of judgment in a Christian context, focusing on biblical interpretations and practical advice for ministry job decisions. It emphasizes the importance of context but presents logical inconsistencies and unsubstantiated claims. Practical advice is offered for ministry job decisions but relies on subjective assumptions.
STR 23/02/13: A World of Pain

This article examines the rationale behind thanking God for a world filled with pain and sin. It points out logical inconsistencies, such as the misuse of analogies, circular reasoning, lack of evidence, and appeals to emotion. The critique emphasizes the necessity of demanding rigorous evidence and logical coherence to evaluate such arguments.
STR 23/02/09: Audience Impact

The STR content discusses whether debating atheists in online chat rooms is beneficial for Christians. It highlights the importance of ethical communication and argues that engaging in these debates can be valuable despite encountering ridicule. However, it criticizes the lack of empirical support for claims and inconsistencies in ethical guidelines, urging the incorporation of empirical…
STR 23/02/06: Eternal Singularity

The #STRask podcast critiques the concept of an eternal singularity, exploring philosophical and scientific viewpoints on time, causality, and logic. It highlights the need for clear definitions and logical coherence in arguments while pointing out unsubstantiated claims and cognitive biases in the content. It invites further discussion on these crucial topics.
STR 23/02/02: Sound-Bite Interactions

The article “How Should I Interact with Someone Who Wants Sound-Bite Answers?” addresses theological questions and handling requests for brief responses. It discusses communicable vs. incommunicable attributes, moral expectations, and strategies for sound-bite answers. However, it presents logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases, weakening its persuasiveness and credibility.
STR 23/01/30: Human Rebellion

The content critiques a meme asserting that if Jesus didn’t come to condemn the world, then Christians should not either. It argues that Christians can acknowledge sin and judgment, emphasizing the role of grace and criticizes those who selectively perceive scripture. It raises concerns about logical coherence, cognitive biases, and unsubstantiated claims within the arguments.
STR 23/01/26: Spiritual Warfare

This post critiques the ethicality of eating meat and the influence of demons on Christians. It highlights logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases in the arguments presented, urging for a more rigorous approach with empirical evidence and critical evaluation of scriptural interpretations. This critique emphasizes the need for a balanced and thoughtful examination of…
STR 23/01/23: Unreliable Translations?

The content “Is the Bible Merely Unreliable Translations Written by Men?” critiques objections to the Bible’s authority, highlighting logical inconsistencies, unsubstantiated claims, and cognitive biases. It suggests employing empirical methods and proportioning belief to evidence to rigorously evaluate religious texts. The critique advocates for substantiating claims with evidence and applying empirical methods to assess the…
STR 23/01/19: Anger and Righteousness

The discussion on imprecatory prayers and New Testament commands explores the complexities of forgiveness, justice, anger, and governmental roles. While asserting the distinction between divine forgiveness and human justice, it overlooks practical considerations, empirical support, and nuanced approaches. The coherence of the argument would benefit from addressing logical inconsistencies and substantiating claims with empirical evidence.
STR 23/01/16: Discipline and Punishment

The article “Critiquing: If God Is Love, Why Did He Kill so Many People in the Old Testament?” addresses the reconciliation of God’s love with biblical instances of divine killings. The critique evaluates logical coherence, identifying fallacies and unsubstantiated claims. It emphasizes the need for rigorous evidence when discussing morally charged topics like divine justice…
STR 23/01/12: Christianity’s Patriarchy

The content responds to inquiries about Christianity’s patriarchal nature and persuading individuals with trauma towards pro-life views from a Christian perspective. Critiques highlight logical inconsistencies, biases, unsubstantiated claims, and a lack of empirical evidence. To strengthen the belief system, aligning beliefs with evidence and engaging diverse perspectives is essential, especially in understanding historical and cultural…
STR 23/01/09: Old Testament Belief

The critique “How Could Someone in the Old Testament Have Believed without First Being Regenerated?” evaluates theological perspectives on Old Testament belief, regeneration, and the devil’s role. It points out logical inconsistencies, fallacies, and biases in the arguments presented, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced, substantiated, and balanced discussion.
STR 23/01/05: Worship Spaces

The discussion explores whether Christians should worship in economical or beautiful spaces and when beautiful music becomes a distraction. It interprets Matthew 6:19 as emphasizing spiritual wealth over material possessions. Historical cathedrals’ relevance is questioned, and the need for empirical evidence to support claims about beauty in worship spaces is highlighted. Financial stewardship is acknowledged,…
STR 23/01/02: Resurrection Claims

The content explores the theological claim that Jesus was the first to rise from the dead, despite biblical accounts of others being resurrected. It discusses the differences between Jesus’ resurrection and others, relying on theological interpretations and biblical references. Logical fallacies, cognitive biases, and the lack of empirical verification are also highlighted, questioning the claim’s…