#AlanShlemon (157) #Amy_K_Hall (157) #Apologetics (148) #AskNTWright (17) #Atheism (11) #BayesianEpistemology (9) #BayesianReasoning (42) #BeliefAndEvidence (14) #BeliefSystems (8) #BiblicalInterpretation (40) #BiblicalStudies (10) #BurdenOfProof (9) #ChristianApologetics (28) #ChristianDoctrine (21) #ChristianEthics (7) #ChristianFaith (11) #christianity (13) #ChristianTheology (15) #CircularReasoning (11) #CognitiveBias (19) #CognitiveBiases (63) #CognitiveDissonance (8) #ConfirmationBias (19) #CriticalExamination (9) #CriticalThinking (73) #CrossExamined (15) #DivineHiddenness (14) #DivineJustice (15) #EmpiricalEvidence (42) #EnoughFaith (15) #EpistemicHumility (8) #EpistemicResponsibility (10) #Epistemology (58) #Evangelical (120) #EvidenceBasedBelief (39) #EvidenceBasedFaith (17) #EvidenceBasedReasoning (10) #Faith (9) #FaithAndEvidence (18) #FaithAndReason (66) #FaithVsEvidence (13) #FaithVsReason (24) #frankturek (19) #GregKoukl (158) #Hermeneutics (10) #HistoricalContext (13) #HistoricalJesus (9) #Jonathan_Noyes (157) #Logic (17) #LogicalCoherence (48) #LogicalConsistency (9) #LogicalCritique (7) #LogicalFallacies (44) #LogicalInconsistencies (30) #MoralArgument (7) #MoralPhilosophy (12) #NTWright (109) #NTWrightOnline (109) #NTWrightPodcast (17) #ObjectiveMorality (9) #PhilosophicalCritique (7) #PhilosophyOfReligion (56) #PodcastCritique (12) #PremierRadio (43) #ProblemOfEvil (13) #RationalBelief (26) #RationalInquiry (30) #rationality (10) #ReligiousDebate (18) #ReligiousEpistemology (11) #ResurrectionDebate (16) #RobbyLashua (157) #ScripturalInterpretation (14) #Skepticism (22) #StandToReason (157) #STR (157) #STRask (158) #StrawManFallacy (8) #STRPodcast (33) #STRTweets (157) #SubstantiateClaims (10) #SubstantiatingClaims (7) #SymbolicLogic (16) #TheologicalCritique (9) #TheologicalDebate (33) #TheologicalInsights (12) #TheologicalQuestions (8) #Theology (19) #TimothyBarnett (156) #UnsubstantiatedClaims (51) atheism (12) bible (84) christianity (113) faith (76) god (99) jesus (51) philosophy (66) religion (64) science (16) theology (20)
Post Tags
Recent posts
-
Hebrews 11:1 is often misquoted as a clear definition of faith, but its Greek origins reveal ambiguity. Different interpretations exist, leading to confusion in Christian discourse. Faith is described both as assurance and as evidence, contributing to semantic sloppiness. Consequently, discussions about faith lack clarity and rigor, oscillating between certitude…
-
This post emphasizes the importance of using AI as a tool for Christian apologetics rather than a replacement for personal discernment. It addresses common concerns among Christians about AI, advocating for its responsible application in improving reasoning, clarity, and theological accuracy. The article outlines various use cases for AI, such…
-
This post argues that if deductive proofs demonstrate the logical incoherence of Christianity’s core teachings, then inductive arguments supporting it lose their evidential strength. Inductive reasoning relies on hypotheses that are logically possible; if a claim-set collapses into contradiction, evidence cannot confirm it. Instead, it may prompt revisions to attain…
-
This post addresses common excuses for rejecting Christianity, arguing that they stem from the human heart’s resistance to surrendering pride and sin. The piece critiques various objections, such as the existence of multiple religions and perceived hypocrisy within Christianity. It emphasizes the uniqueness of Christianity, the importance of faith in…
-
Isn’t the killing of infants always best under Christian theology? This post demonstrates that the theological premises used to defend biblical violence collapse into absurdity when applied consistently. If your theology implies that a school shooter is a more effective savior than a missionary, the error lies in the theology.
-
This article discusses the counterproductive nature of hostile Christian apologetics, which can inadvertently serve the skepticism community. When apologists exhibit traits like hostility and arrogance, they undermine their persuasive efforts and authenticity. This phenomenon, termed the Repellent Effect, suggests that such behavior diminishes the credibility of their arguments. As a…
-
The article highlights the value of AI tools, like Large Language Models, to “Red Team” apologetic arguments, ensuring intellectual integrity. It explains how AI can identify logical fallacies such as circular reasoning, strawman arguments, and tone issues, urging apologists to embrace critique for improved discourse. The author advocates for rigorous…
-
The concept of the Holy Spirit’s indwelling is central to Christian belief, promising transformative experiences and divine insights. However, this article highlights that the claimed supernatural benefits, such as unique knowledge, innovation, accurate disaster predictions, and improved health outcomes, do not manifest in believers. Instead, evidence shows that Christians demonstrate…
-
This post exposes how Christian apologists attempt to escape the moral weight of 1 Samuel 15:3, where God commands Saul to kill infants among the Amalekites. It argues that the “hyperbole defense” is self-refuting because softening the command proves its literal reading is indefensible and implies divine deception if exaggerated.…
-
This post challenges both skeptics and Christians for abusing biblical atrocity texts by failing to distinguish between descriptive and prescriptive passages. Skeptics often cite descriptive narratives like Nahum 3:10 or Psalm 137:9 as if they were divine commands, committing a genre error that weakens their critique. Christians, on the other…
-
In rational inquiry, the source of a message does not influence its validity; truth depends on logical structure and evidence. Human bias towards accepting or rejecting ideas based on origin—known as the genetic fallacy—hinders clear thinking. The merit of arguments lies in coherence and evidential strength, not in the messenger’s…
-
The defense of biblical inerrancy overlooks a critical flaw: internal contradictions within its concepts render the notion incoherent, regardless of textual accuracy. Examples include the contradiction between divine love and commanded genocide, free will versus foreordination, and the clash between faith and evidence. These logical inconsistencies negate the divine origin…
-
The referenced video outlines various arguments for the existence of God, categorized based on insights from over 100 Christian apologists. The arguments range from existential experiences and unique, less-cited claims, to evidence about Jesus, moral reasoning, and creation-related arguments. Key apologists emphasize different perspectives, with some arguing against a single…
This response is a necessary reboot of your position, Ryan. You have effectively abandoned the “stopping rule” epistemology you previously…
I understand your analogy and analysis, but I think you are confusing something. As I read the scriptures, I do…
This is a list of probing questions designed to clarify and scrutinize your epistemic position, particularly in light of the…
◉ The Infinite Gap: Where Biblical Salvation Breaks Epistemic Hygiene Ryan, let’s take that imagery of the cliff and the…
Ryan, your latest response confirms my suspicion: you are confusing pragmatic utility (the necessity to act within a physical, high-stakes…
Since your whole refutation hinges on a flawed Bayesian approach to epistemology, I will only address one part of your…
(Continued from Above): 4b.) The following elements in your understanding of the creation/common Christian interpretations (and correct me if I’ve…
In response to the specific points in your last post: 1.) Respectfully, what appeared to a form of “question-begging” was…
Thanks for the response. I apologize if my posts weren’t well-outlined or well-formatted: it would probably have been better…
Free of Faith 
In a personal chat about the scenario in which a young girl with a Muslim father and a Christian mother,…