#AlanShlemon (157) #Amy_K_Hall (157) #Apologetics (156) #AskNTWright (17) #Atheism (17) #BayesianEpistemology (9) #BayesianReasoning (43) #BeliefAndEvidence (14) #BeliefSystems (9) #BiblicalCriticism (10) #BiblicalInterpretation (41) #BiblicalStudies (10) #BurdenOfProof (10) #ChristianApologetics (32) #ChristianDoctrine (21) #ChristianFaith (11) #christianity (13) #ChristianTheology (15) #CircularReasoning (11) #CognitiveBias (20) #CognitiveBiases (63) #CognitiveDissonance (12) #ConfirmationBias (20) #CriticalExamination (9) #CriticalThinking (81) #CrossExamined (15) #DivineCommandTheory (8) #DivineHiddenness (15) #DivineJustice (15) #EmpiricalEvidence (43) #EnoughFaith (15) #EpistemicHumility (9) #EpistemicResponsibility (10) #Epistemology (67) #Evangelical (120) #EvidenceBasedBelief (41) #EvidenceBasedFaith (17) #EvidenceBasedReasoning (10) #Faith (9) #FaithAndEvidence (18) #FaithAndReason (67) #FaithVsEvidence (13) #FaithVsReason (26) #frankturek (19) #GregKoukl (158) #Hermeneutics (12) #HistoricalContext (13) #HistoricalJesus (11) #IntellectualHonesty (8) #Jonathan_Noyes (157) #Logic (17) #LogicalCoherence (48) #LogicalConsistency (9) #LogicalFallacies (46) #LogicalInconsistencies (30) #MoralPhilosophy (13) #Naturalism (9) #NTWright (109) #NTWrightOnline (109) #NTWrightPodcast (17) #ObjectiveMorality (9) #PhilosophyOfReligion (60) #PodcastCritique (12) #PremierRadio (43) #ProblemOfEvil (14) #RationalBelief (26) #RationalInquiry (33) #rationality (12) #ReligiousDebate (18) #ReligiousEpistemology (11) #ResurrectionDebate (16) #RobbyLashua (157) #ScripturalInterpretation (14) #Skepticism (33) #StandToReason (157) #STR (157) #STRask (158) #StrawManFallacy (9) #STRPodcast (33) #STRTweets (157) #SubstantiateClaims (10) #SymbolicLogic (16) #TextualAnalysis (8) #TheologicalCritique (9) #TheologicalDebate (33) #TheologicalInsights (12) #TheologicalQuestions (8) #Theology (24) #TimothyBarnett (156) #UnsubstantiatedClaims (51) atheism (12) bible (84) christianity (113) faith (76) god (99) jesus (51) philosophy (66) religion (64) science (16) theology (20)
Post Tags
Recent posts
-
Alvin Plantinga’s “Warrant” isn’t an epistemic upgrade; it’s a design for inaccuracy. My formal proof demonstrates that maximizing the binary status of “knowledge” forces a cognitive system to be less accurate than one simply tracking evidence. We must eliminate “knowledge” as a rigorous concept, replacing it with credencing—the honest pursuit…
-
This article critiques the stark gap between the New Testament’s unequivocal promises of answered prayer and their empirical failure. It examines the theological “bait-and-switch” where bold pulpit guarantees of supernatural intervention are neutralized by “creative hermeneutics” in small groups, transforming literal promises into unfalsifiable, psychological coping mechanisms through evasive logic…
-
This article characterizes theology as a “floating fortress”—internally coherent but isolated from empirical reality. It details how specific theological claims regarding prayer, miracles, and scientific facts fail verification tests. The argument posits that theology survives only through evasion tactics like redefinition and metaphor, functioning as a self-contained simulation rather than…
-
Modern apologists argue that religious belief is a rational map of evidence, likening it to scientific frameworks. However, a deeper analysis reveals a stark contrast. While science adapts to reality through empirical testing and falsifiability, theology insulates belief from contradictory evidence. The theological system absorbs anomalies instead of yielding to…
-
This post critiques the concept of “childlike faith” in religion, arguing that it promotes an uncritical acceptance of beliefs without evidence. It highlights that while children naturally trust authority figures, this lack of skepticism can lead to false beliefs. The author emphasizes the importance of cognitive maturity and predictive power…
-
This analysis examines the agonizing moral conflict presented by the explicit biblical command to slaughter Amalekite infants in 1 Samuel 15:3. Written from a skeptical, moral non-realist perspective, it rigorously deconstructs the various apologetic strategies employed to defend this divine directive as “good.” The post critiques common evasions, such as…
-
In the realm of Christian apologetics, few topics generate as much palpable discomfort as the Old Testament narratives depicting divinely ordered genocide. While many believers prefer to gloss over these passages, serious apologists feel compelled to defend them. They must reconcile a God described as “perfect love” with a deity…
-
This post examines various conditions Christians often attach to prayer promises, transforming them into unfalsifiable claims. It highlights how these ‘failsafe’ mechanisms protect the belief system from scrutiny, allowing believers to reinterpret prayer outcomes either as successes or failures based on internal states or hidden conditions. This results in a…
-
In public discourse, labels such as “atheist,” “agnostic,” and “Christian” often oversimplify complex beliefs, leading to misunderstandings. These tags are low-resolution summaries that hinder rational discussions. Genuine inquiry requires moving beyond labels to assess individual credences and evidence. Understanding belief as a gradient reflects the nuances of thought, promoting clarity…
-
This post argues against extreme views in debates about the historical Jesus, emphasizing the distinction between the theological narrative shaped by scriptural interpretation and the existence of a human core. It maintains that while the Gospels serve theological purposes, they do not negate the likelihood of a historical figure, supported…
-
Hebrews 11:1 is often misquoted as a clear definition of faith, but its Greek origins reveal ambiguity. Different interpretations exist, leading to confusion in Christian discourse. Faith is described both as assurance and as evidence, contributing to semantic sloppiness. Consequently, discussions about faith lack clarity and rigor, oscillating between certitude…
-
This post emphasizes the importance of using AI as a tool for Christian apologetics rather than a replacement for personal discernment. It addresses common concerns among Christians about AI, advocating for its responsible application in improving reasoning, clarity, and theological accuracy. The article outlines various use cases for AI, such…
Dear Phil, I’ve been hanging onto Christianity out of fear for decades now. Back in college, I started doing some…
Thanks for another interesting piece (as usual). I might add that even the “flying” fortress theologians have tried to build…
Good insights! “William Philosophers” definitely refers to William of Ockham.
Given that I read a collection of Russell’s works on religion a few years ago, the reference to the teapot…
Alright, thanks for the insights. While I’ve read works on ethics and ethical theories (including some of Immanuel Kant’s more…
Hi J, I’m a moral non-realist. I hold that there are no legitimate moral obligations since a moral realm has…
Hi Phil: Apologies if this isn’t really related to skepticism, but I was wondering: What are your thoughts on the…
Has Juan considered the problems with divine command theory and could he address the following?: a.) What makes Christian versions…
Juan has been blocked. I ran out of both daylight and patience.A debriefing has been added above in the light…
Free of Faith 
Hi Christopher, I just sent you a response by email. Cheers.