Critiquing: #087 — Who was the Apostle Paul and why does he still matter?
October 14, 2021 | Ask NT Wright Anything – Premier
Paul’s significance — Historical context — Theological insights — Cultural synthesis — Community impact
Episode Assessment:
 | | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Degree of Accuracy | A | The episode accurately portrays Paul’s historical context, his writings, and his role in early Christianity. The content aligns well with established historical and theological scholarship. |
| Degree of Coherence | B+ | The episode maintains a logical structure, beginning with Paul’s historical context, moving to his theological contributions, and concluding with his lasting impact. Some minor transitions between topics could be smoother. |
| Absence of Fallacies | B | While generally free from logical fallacies, there are a few instances of hasty generalizations, particularly regarding Paul’s universal influence across different cultures and times. |
| Degree of Evidence | B+ | The discussion is supported by substantial evidence from Paul’s letters, historical records, and secondary scholarship. However, some interpretations, especially those related to Paul’s personal life, are speculative. |
| Degree of Testability | C | Many theological claims, such as the spiritual significance of Paul’s teachings, are inherently difficult to test empirically. The historical aspects are more testable, but interpretations of Paul’s intentions are often conjectural. |
| Rational Confidence | B | Confidence in the historical and textual evidence is high, but theological conclusions, especially those about Paul’s ultimate influence and motivations, are less certain due to the speculative nature of some claims. |
Potential/Apparent Weaknesses:
1. Speculative Interpretations
“I think this is Mum and Dad, I think this is brother and sister, I think this is even possibly a one-time fiancé.”
The interpretation of Romans 9:1-5 involves speculation about Paul’s personal relationships, which is not directly supported by historical evidence. Such conjectures, while interesting, can detract from the scholarly rigor of the analysis, as they are based more on inference than on verifiable data.
Formulations of Major Arguments
Argument 1: The Significance of Paul
Premise 1: Paul was a key figure in early Christianity.
Premise 2: Paul’s teachings and writings have had a profound impact on Christian theology and practice.
Premise 3: Paul’s efforts helped bridge the Jewish and Gentile worlds.
Premise 4: The integration of Jewish and Gentile traditions created a unique cultural synthesis.
Conclusion: Therefore, Paul is a significant figure in the history of Christianity and Western thought.
Counter-Argument:
While Paul’s significance in Christian history is undeniable, attributing the entirety of early Christian development to him overlooks the contributions of other figures like Peter, James, and John. Early Christianity was a diverse movement with multiple leaders and influences. Additionally, the cultural and theological synthesis Paul attempted was not universally accepted; various sects and interpretations arose, some of which directly opposed Paul’s views. Thus, the development of early Christianity was a collective effort, and Paul’s role, though pivotal, should be seen as part of a broader mosaic of influences.
Argument 2: The New Power in the World
Premise 1: Paul preached a new kind of power centered on suffering love.
Premise 2: This new power contrasts with the traditional Roman concept of power based on domination and control.
Premise 3: Paul’s teachings aimed to subvert and redefine the concept of power in society.
Premise 4: The transformative potential of this new power is evidenced in the early Christian communities.
Conclusion: Therefore, Paul introduced a transformative concept of power through his teachings.
Counter-Argument:
The idea of a new power through suffering love is compelling, yet its practical application and acceptance varied significantly. The Roman Empire’s structure and influence persisted long after Paul, indicating that his vision was not immediately transformative. Additionally, concepts of power through humility and suffering were not unique to Paul but were also present in earlier Jewish and prophetic traditions. Furthermore, the adoption of this new power was uneven, with many early Christians struggling to fully embrace and practice it. Therefore, while Paul’s articulation was influential, it must be viewed within a broader historical and cultural context that includes other traditions and a recognition of its gradual and uneven impact.
◉ Ideologies of Power:
Challenging the False Dichotomy between Military Power and Paul’s Concept of Suffering Love
In the narrative of history, power has often been synonymous with military might. This conventional portrayal presents power as an entity that exerts itself through domination, violence, and control. However, the Apostle Paul’s teaching introduces an alternative notion of power, one rooted in suffering love and spiritual strength. While this may seem a noble contrast to the destructive forces of military power, it is imperative to recognize the false dichotomy this creates. There exists a plethora of ideologies that advocate for power through means other than militaristic dominance or the passivity often associated with Christian teachings on faith.
Historically, Stoicism has offered a profound alternative to the concept of power. Stoics believe in the power of the mind over the external world. For them, true power comes from self-control, rational thought, and emotional resilience. This ideology promotes an inner strength that is neither passive nor militaristic. It empowers individuals to master their own reactions and emotions, thereby exercising a form of power that is both personal and transformative.
Similarly, Confucianism posits an ideology of power based on moral virtue and social harmony. According to Confucian thought, power is not derived from physical force but from the ethical behavior and righteous conduct of individuals, especially those in positions of leadership. This philosophy asserts that moral authority and ethical governance can bring about social order and collective well-being, a concept fundamentally different from both military might and the notion of suffering love as depicted by Paul.
Buddhism also offers an intriguing perspective on power. It emphasizes the power of mindfulness, compassion, and enlightenment. Buddhists believe that true power lies in the ability to overcome ignorance, craving, and aversion through the cultivation of wisdom and inner peace. This form of power is neither aggressive nor passive but is instead deeply transformative, focusing on the inner revolution of the individual.
Moreover, Humanism provides a secular approach to the concept of power. Humanism places faith in human reason, ethics, and justice. It advocates for power through knowledge, scientific inquiry, and the pursuit of human rights. This ideology champions the idea that power can be exercised through intellectual advancement and moral progress, rejecting both the authoritarianism of militaristic power and the passivity often associated with religious faith.
Lastly, the ideology of Libertarianism emphasizes the power of individual freedom and autonomy. It posits that power should not be centralized but rather distributed among individuals who are free to pursue their own interests. This ideology promotes the idea that personal liberty and self-determination are the true markers of power, standing in stark contrast to the coercive nature of military power and the submissive undertones of religious faith.
In conclusion, the attempt to juxtapose military might with Paul’s notion of power through suffering love creates a misleading binary. Power is not confined to these two extremes. Numerous ideologies throughout history and across cultures have articulated visions of power that are neither militaristic nor rooted in the passive acceptance of suffering. These ideologies offer rich, diverse perspectives on how power can be conceived and exercised in ways that promote self-mastery, moral virtue, compassion, intellectual progress, and personal freedom. It is essential to move beyond the simplistic dichotomy and embrace the complexity of power in its many forms.
Warm welcome to discuss this topic further in the comments section. Your insights and perspectives are valuable as we explore the multifaceted nature of power and its implications in our world today.
Free of Faith 
Leave a comment